Articles

Article: ‘Litigant Partisan Identity and Challenges to Campaign Finance Policies: An Examination of U.S. District Court Decisions, 1971–2007’, by Kyle C. Kopko

This study seeks to determine if the partisan affiliation (Democrat or Republican) of a plaintiff challenging a local, state, or federal campaign finance policy influences the case votes of U.S. district court judges. Using an original database of campaign finance cases decided between 1971 and 2007, I find that judges do not systematically favor challenges… Continue reading Article: ‘Litigant Partisan Identity and Challenges to Campaign Finance Policies: An Examination of U.S. District Court Decisions, 1971–2007’, by Kyle C. Kopko

Articles

Article: ‘Trailblazers and Those That Followed – Personal Experiences, Gender, and Judicial Empathy’, by Laura P. Moyer and Susan B. Haire

This article investigates one causal mechanism that may explain why female judges on the federal appellate courts are more likely than men to side with plaintiffs in sex discrimination cases. To test whether personal experiences with inequality are related to empathetic responses to the claims of female plaintiffs, we focus on the first wave of… Continue reading Article: ‘Trailblazers and Those That Followed – Personal Experiences, Gender, and Judicial Empathy’, by Laura P. Moyer and Susan B. Haire

Articles

Article: ‘Lie Detector Brain Scans Could Be the Future of Murder Trials’, by David Cox

Gary Smith lay in an fMRI scanner as a series of pre-programmed questions appear on the screen in front of him, at five second intervals. “Did you share an apartment with Mike McQueen?” “Did you shoot Mike McQueen with a revolver?” “Did you kill Mike McQueen?” In response to each question, Smith clicked a button… Continue reading Article: ‘Lie Detector Brain Scans Could Be the Future of Murder Trials’, by David Cox

Articles

Article: ‘The Strategic Designation of Visiting Judges in the U.S. Courts of Appeals’, by Jeffrey Budziak

Judges serving in the United States Courts of Appeals are theorized to pursue goals related to both the content of legal policy and the institutional maintenance of their court in the decision-making process. However, it is unclear how judges respond when these two goals are put into competition. To answer this question, I investigate the… Continue reading Article: ‘The Strategic Designation of Visiting Judges in the U.S. Courts of Appeals’, by Jeffrey Budziak