Website proposal: ‘Courts and Policy’ Goals Courts & Policy is inspired by the belief that judicial studies can and should improve public policy making in relation to the roles and responsibilities of the judiciary and courts, but that too little scholarly literature is available in this important area (although we aim only to publish material… Continue reading New article
This study seeks to determine if the partisan affiliation (Democrat or Republican) of a plaintiff challenging a local, state, or federal campaign finance policy influences the case votes of U.S. district court judges. Using an original database of campaign finance cases decided between 1971 and 2007, I find that judges do not systematically favor challenges… Continue reading Article: ‘Litigant Partisan Identity and Challenges to Campaign Finance Policies: An Examination of U.S. District Court Decisions, 1971–2007’, by Kyle C. Kopko
This article investigates one causal mechanism that may explain why female judges on the federal appellate courts are more likely than men to side with plaintiffs in sex discrimination cases. To test whether personal experiences with inequality are related to empathetic responses to the claims of female plaintiffs, we focus on the first wave of… Continue reading Article: ‘Trailblazers and Those That Followed – Personal Experiences, Gender, and Judicial Empathy’, by Laura P. Moyer and Susan B. Haire
The Center for Ethics and Public Affairs at the Murphy Institute at Tulane University invites applications for three Visiting Research Professorships/Faculty Fellowships for the 2016-2017 academic year. These fellowships are available to support outstanding faculty whose teaching and research focus on ethics, political philosophy, and political theory, or questions of moral choice in areas such as, but not restricted… Continue reading Opportunity: Tulane University – Visiting Research Professorships/Faculty Fellowships (DL: not specified)
Gary Smith lay in an fMRI scanner as a series of pre-programmed questions appear on the screen in front of him, at five second intervals. “Did you share an apartment with Mike McQueen?” “Did you shoot Mike McQueen with a revolver?” “Did you kill Mike McQueen?” In response to each question, Smith clicked a button… Continue reading Article: ‘Lie Detector Brain Scans Could Be the Future of Murder Trials’, by David Cox
Judges serving in the United States Courts of Appeals are theorized to pursue goals related to both the content of legal policy and the institutional maintenance of their court in the decision-making process. However, it is unclear how judges respond when these two goals are put into competition. To answer this question, I investigate the… Continue reading Article: ‘The Strategic Designation of Visiting Judges in the U.S. Courts of Appeals’, by Jeffrey Budziak
This text is a general introduction to American judicial process. The authors cover the major institutions, actors, and processes that comprise the U.S. legal system, viewed from a political science perspective. Grounding their presentation in empirical social science terms, the authors identify popular myths about the structure and processes of American law and courts and… Continue reading Book: ‘American Judicial Process: Myth and Reality in Law and Courts’, by Pamela C. Corley, Artemus Ward and Wendy L. Martinek
courtsandpolicy 